![]() Something like a thread protector with a different crown geometry could theoretically cause a reduction in perceived flash.īut that caveat is so convoluted and unlikely there's no need to worry about it. So theoretically, because the law is so arbitrary and open ended, if a muzzle device reduces flash by. There is no mention in the law on how they would test or prove a device reduces flash, and as far as I know, there's never been a court case on it. The only small caveat I have is that CA laws considers a muzzle device to be a flash hider if it has flash reducing properties, even if they're not advertised. The V2 has no mention of flash reducing properties in it's advertising, so it should be fine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |